Tuesday, October 20, 2026Denver, Colorado SearchSubscribe
Colorado Tribune The statewide paper of record.

Front Range

Denver council bill would give exceptional trees 'Legacy' protection and make developers plant or pay

Council Bill 26-1451, introduced Sept. 29 at the request of Parks and Recreation, heads to the Parks, Art and Culture Committee on Oct. 6. It would create a voluntary Legacy Tree designation, require planting on major projects, and let the city forester charge market-rate fees when planting is not feasible.

Mature trees at Montclair Park in Denver. A council bill headed to committee Oct. 6 would create a Legacy Tree designation to protect the city's exceptional trees from removal or damage.
Mature trees at Montclair Park in Denver. A council bill headed to committee Oct. 6 would create a Legacy Tree designation to protect the city's exceptional trees from removal or damage.Jeffrey Beall, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons · Source

Trees could qualify for Legacy status based on size, age, rarity or historical or cultural significance. A tree would receive protection while the city forester reviews a designation application. If approved, the designation would be recorded with city property records, and owners could not remove or damage a designated tree.

The draft allows a designation to be lifted in specified circumstances, including an imminent safety hazard or when a tree prevents reasonable development after design options and zoning relief have been exhausted. The designation is voluntary rather than automatic, so exceptional trees would only be covered once an application succeeds.

Downtown Denver. Council Bill 26-1451 would require planting for new primary structures and certain larger additions, with a per-tree fee to the Public Tree Canopy fund when planting is not feasible.
Downtown Denver. Council Bill 26-1451 would require planting for new primary structures and certain larger additions, with a per-tree fee to the Public Tree Canopy fund when planting is not feasible.cyprien, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons · Source

The bill also reaches beyond landmark trees. It would require planting for projects such as new primary structures, certain accessory structures or additions with estimated construction costs of $100,000 or more, and some street construction. It would require permits to remove established trees in protected street setbacks during demolition or construction, and require protective measures for trees during construction, with the city forester able to require monitoring by a qualified arborist.

When required planting is infeasible, the developer would pay a per-tree fee set by the city forester at market rates. The fee would be due before a building permit is issued and would go to the Public Tree Canopy fund. The city forester would set a market-based rate schedule, which could be adjusted annually.

A newly planted young tree with a slow-release watering bag. The bill's planting requirements would extend to new primary structures and some street construction projects.
A newly planted young tree with a slow-release watering bag. The bill's planting requirements would extend to new primary structures and some street construction projects.Gogerr, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons · Source

As filed, the bill amends and revises Denver Revised Municipal Code, Chapter 57, Articles II and IV concerning the Office of the City Forester, a package the city describes as strengthening tree preservation and protection in Denver. It sits as a committee action item; the Oct. 6 Parks, Art and Culture Committee hearing is the next step.

The bill was introduced at the request of Parks and Recreation, the department that houses the city forester's office, and the city's Legistar record lists it as a committee action item rather than a consent item, meaning it is slated for deliberation rather than a routine vote. Its official title frames the package as a strengthening of the tree preservation rules the forester enforces.

The first public test comes Oct. 6, when the Parks, Art and Culture Committee takes up the proposal. How the committee handles the market-rate fee and the Legacy designation will signal whether the bill moves forward largely as drafted or gets reworked before it reaches the full council.

The full text of the draft ordinance is attached to the bill's Legistar record, where residents and developers can read the proposed code changes ahead of the committee hearing.

Denver City Council trees urban forestry development

More from Front Range

Colorado's Goc Malual (8) finishes at the rim over North Texas defender Cole Franklin (10) during Sunday's Mile High Hoops Classic exhibition at the Auraria Event Center in Denver, with Alex Dickeson (1) in the foreground.

Front Range

Buffs hold off North Texas 67-64 in Denver exhibition thriller

Freshman Alex Dickeson scored a team-high 15 points and Colorado survived two missed North Texas three-pointers in the final seconds of the Mile High Hoops Classic at the Auraria Event Center.

Stefan Marenco · 2026-10-19

A Denver player carries the puck against Michigan at Magness Arena, in a photograph from Friday's series opener. Michigan won the opener 4-1 and completed the sweep with a 4-3 win on Saturday.

Front Range

No. 1 Pioneers rally to tie, but Michigan wins 4-3 on a late bounce

Kieran Cebrian tied the game at 3-3 in the third period, but Asher Barnett's shot caromed in with 4:53 left as No. 2 Michigan completed a two-game sweep at Magness Arena.

Stefan Marenco · 2026-10-19

Folsom Field under the lights for a night game against Utah, in a 2016 file photograph. Saturday's meeting with the Utes also came down to the final play at the same stadium.

Front Range

Colorado rally falls short as No. 11 Utah holds on 27-24 in Boulder

Down 13-0 at halftime, Colorado scored 17 straight points to lead No. 11 Utah in the third quarter. A late Isaac Wilson interception set up the Utes' winning touchdown, and a final Hail Mary was batted down at Folsom Field.

Stefan Marenco · 2026-10-18

Colorado TribuneFront Range